Get Our Newsletter!

Historic vote rezones property for high-density housing
Email Print
Historic vote rezones property for high-density housing | Bristol Development Group, Mayor Paul Webb, Brentwood City Commission, Brentwood TN news, Brentwood Home Page, Northwest Mutual, Town Center development

Town Center exempt from city's one residence per one acre

By CAROL STUART
Brentwood Home Page
The City Commission voted 6-1 in a historic decision Thursday to rezone 7.03 acres of property adjacent to busy Brentwood Place shopping center, making way for Brentwood's first high-density residential community.

Mayor Paul Webb was the only vote against the rezoning for the proposed site of a four-story, mixed-use project to include 393 residential units and retail space.

Some believe the Northwest Mutual-owned project, being constructed by Bristol Development Group, will jump start the Town Center vision of a place to live-shop-work to a reality. Opponents, however, see the first step of changing the commercial property to the C-4 zone as a negative step against the quality of life in Brentwood.

The city, chartered in 1969, has always adhered to the principle of one acre per residence -- although revisions have been made to the policy along the way.

Parmenter

"I'm really proud of our commissioners. This was a tough decision," said Cindi Parmenter of the Brentwood Cool Springs Chamber of Commerce. "They've toed the line in the past about rezoning residential property commercial, but they had a chance with this one to really maximize this commercial property and they did so.

"It's really a good move for the future of Brentwood."

With the rezoning passed, Northwest Bristol Development Group are expected to bring real plans to the city's planning commission for a site plan and approval, apparently on Monday. Webb said he wouldn't be surprised if construction wasn't started by 60 days.

"We were not surprised. We expected they would pass it," said Shirley Putnam, a Brentwood resident opposing the change. "... Most people in Brentwood don't even know this is taking place."

Putnam said when she started making phone calls three weeks ago, only two people had heard of the issue. Robert Dorrell, a college student about to return to Wake Forest, had helped pass out flyers and then had to change them when the city moved the date to a special-called meeting so all commissioners could be present.

Putnam said the grass roots effort will now follow the project through the planning commission steps.

Condos? Or apartments?

After hearing passionate comments both pro and con from about a fourth of the 100 or so people attending the meeting, six of the seven commissioners made statements before the vote was taken. Almost all mentioned the public was split on the vote, with Regina Smithson saying even her family was divided for and against.

Proponents of the proposed Town Center development say it would provide high-end housing options currently not available in Brentwood that are affordable and in demand space-wise for young professionals and empty-nesters. Residents in opposition say although these proposed units are deeded separately and will be built to codes as condos, they are apartments instead since they will be leased and likened the size of a number of the units to motel rooms.

"Our society is changing," said new commisisoner Rod Freeman, who has young adult children. "We have an opportunity in this community to help manage that change, that growth."

Crossley

He noted that Parmenter called them "renters by choice." Freeman also emphasized that this is a commercial zone, not a residential one.

Rob Francour, a property investor for Northwest Mutual, said the company plans to own the units as an investment for its policy holders for 7-10 years, rather than sell them. The company, which has cash ready for the project, has owned one of its properties even for 23 years.

"I think this commission has taken an extremely historic vote, and it's going to take all the due diligence it's taken to prepare it so far, to continue it on and make sure it meets Brentwood's standards," commissioner Betsy Crossley said.

"It isn't over; it's just beginning. So we're trying to work with everybody and I think the public will have much input on what's going on with it. And I welcome it."

City looking to build on vision

Commissioners Rhea Little and Ann Dunn both brought up the 20/20 plan from 2000 which the city -- drawing upon residents' desires -- had envisioned a vibrant downtown district with shops, restaurants, offices and living space. Voters in the May campaign had also talked about optional living spaces and a lifestyle district, comissioners say.

Little

"The Town Center is unique," Little said. "... The residential section needs to stay one-acre density."

He said the ordinance to create the district had been in place four years before the economic and real estate collapse of 2008 -- and still only three buildings had been built.

Little also noted that almost 60 percent of the revenue comes from the city's commercial properties, but commercial comprises less than 5 percent of the land space. The city, meanwhile, has 10 percent set aside in green space.

Additionally, Little -- citing opponents' previous concerns about crime -- said that "evil is in the heart of a person, not their abode." He mentioned a Brenthaven house arson for insurance money and a Carondolet murder of a mother-in-law.

Little also looked into "party" disturbance calls to Brentwood Police this year -- and read out names of several current neighborhoods involved in 27 incidents over the past 30 weeks.

He also looked up and compared the amount of tax money the project is estimated to draw for the city and county -- $520,000 -- and compared that to Brentwood Country Club subdivision including the club ($641,000), Country Club Estates ($119,300) and Meadowlake ($497,000).

Lot rezoned from C-2 Commercial-Retail to C-4 Commercial-Town Center

Dunn also noted it had been 11 years since the Town Center had been conceptualized and talked about.

"I've been a proponent, a champion of the one-acre density," she said of her 20 years on the commission. "There is a difference in commercial zoning and residential zoning."

Dunn said getting tax revenues from commercial property also protects neighborhoods by keeping them from paying higher taxes. She also said the commission had been careful in making decisions in the past and would continue to do so.

"There are not going to be developments up and down Franklin Road," she said.

Francour also emphasized that the investment company prefers a project which doesn't have competition -- and thinks this is a unique opportunity in Brentwood.

From history to the future

Commissioner Regina Smithson, offended over re-election threats for how she would vote, said she never voted based on the amount of tax revenues or there would be developments on the Cal Turner, Flagpole and other properties.

Smithson said she thought it was the right project and the right time for the Town Center.

Several of the commissioners talked about the high socio-economic status of the residents targeted for the development as well.

Webb

Webb said he was voting against rezoning the property because he thought the residential units in the proposed development -- which has yet to go through site-plan approval -- were "too small and too many." He said he conceived more of two-story buildings spread out, with residential space above storefronts -- not the 58 units per acre density.

Crossley, meanwhile read through a list of historic times and decisions in the city's history, starting with intelligence officers in the 1940s tracking U-boats on the East Coast from the WSM Tower. She noted that a phone call from Lipscomb Elementary to the tower across the street was long distance in the 1950s, and then Interstate-65 came along in the 1960s.

When the city incorporated within the decade, there was opposition because people would have to pay taxes, support the infrastructure and there would be more growth, she said.

Crossley also noted that the one-acre zoning was adjusted in 1972 (after the Brentwood Country Club development) to allow for the total acreage of a development to average over the number of residences to one acre. More than 150 different subdivisions now in the city were built under the residential zoning adjustment, Crossley said.

Crossley also noted the massive Maryland Farms office park was then built on a previous horse farm property. After reeling off each of those historic decisions, she asked if the commission had made the right one. Crossley also pointed out the city has had a balanced budget and no property tax hike in 21 years due to those decisions.

"I think it's a turning point in the development of the Town Center," Parmenter said after the meeting. "We can talk about what we want it to be all day long, but until somebody invests some money and builds it according to the plan -- which is exactly what this is -- then you don't know what's going to happen. So this is the beginning."

Webb, however, said he wonders what will happen when the next C-4 parcel owner comes forward with a similar plan without rezoning required.

 

Printer-friendly format


Member Opinions:
By: MidTn37027 on 7/29/11
Studies support the fact that "walkable" neighborhoods like these, where people can live, work and play without getting into a car very often, offer a number of benefits that can have a positive effect on a community's environment, health and finances.

This was an important step in creating the nucleus for developing the Town Center. Kudos to the Commissioners that had the vision and courage to do what was right for Brentwood overall.

By: GrantHammond on 7/29/11
It amazes me how many people think these apartments will bring in a "bad" or even criminal element. That is ridiculous. Look at the success of Southern Land's Dwell in Cool Springs to predict how this development will affect Brentwood Town Center.

By: Dave on 7/29/11
I have immense confidence in the City Counsel members and city government. While I share the same concerns that Paul Webb has, which are the problems associated with density (traffic in particular), I assume every detail was reviewed. Its a gamble, nonetheless, but its a calculated gamble as the other major decisions have been in the past.

By: RetiredGuy on 7/29/11
Well done Commissioners!

By: cpateach on 7/29/11
393 condos in the center of Brentwood. My concern is about just who those residents could be - (1) Metro families who cannot afford Williamson County property costs but want their children in the WCS district, especially with its reputation for meeting needs of IEP students; and (2) Metro parents who CAN afford to invest in rental condos, repositioning their $$$$$$ from pricey Metro private schools to WCS (all it takes is a utilities bill / water bill receipt to prove residency). While the condos have been pitched as meeting needs for young adults and empty nesters, I believe the result is going to burden the already stretched-to-the-max school system and possibly have a negative effect on private schools. Result - need for more school space / personnel - taxpayers will foot the bill for the fallout of 393 condos. I hope it doesn't happen this way; however, families from other districts annually figure out how to get into the WCS system. Someone has to pay the costs. I love, appreciate, and teach children every day, but it is increasingly difficult to find adequate space in classrooms and provide quality instruction with growing numbers and budget cuts.

By: RetiredGuy on 7/29/11
Last I looked, there are apartments galore in Cool Springs and they rent for a lot less than Bristol's tenants will pay. Guess most of those smart Ravenswood kids are really illegal aliens from Davidson County.

By: cpateach on 7/29/11
My concern has nothing to do with illegal aliens; likewise, my experience teaching in the district has not involved any illegal aliens. However, the number of special needs students is growing rapidly, as is the number of families of non-IEP students wanting to be here.To serve those students according to their legal rights means heavy financial investment. Our commitment is to serve all students well; if the numbers grow significantly, taxpayers will absorb the costs.

By: ForBrentwood on 7/29/11
Little and Crossley need to check their stats on commercial contributions to City revenues. Sales taxes are remitted by commercial entities but are paid largely from sales to individual residents. Residential property assessed values far exceed commercial assessments in Brentwood. Amazing how Crossley wants to give Brentwood residents a history lesson yet didn't live in Brentwood when most of this "out of the box" community established standards and distinguished itself by not falling prey to every developer that sought a rezoning! Is Parmenter even a Brentwood resident or does she still live in Brentville?

By: spike on 7/30/11
Why was deception necessary to get this approved? Why was the word "condominium" ever associated with this project. The intent was obviously always as an apartment project. Paul Webb got this one right.

By: MidTn37027 on 7/31/11
Deception? LOL! Our Commissioners are highly ethical people that want to do the right thing for Brentwood. They weren't trying to "hide" anything. In fact, they all went well out of their way to get different opinions on this project. I may or may not agree with the decisions they make, but you can be assured they have Brentwood's best interest at heart.

If people want to stay abreast of what's going on in the community, they should read the papers, the Brentwood Home Page or try going to a City Commission meeting once in a while. This project was well communicated by the City, as they do with every thing they do.

Yes, they've stated they will lease them out,
but they're called "condos" because that's how they're being deeded. Pretty simple.

And, does anyone really think this project will flood our schools? 92 out of 393 units are tiny, one bedroom units that very likely will not be rented by families. There is no indication whatsoever that there will be that many families with children that will live there. As noted by the City, it's likely to be a preponderance of young professionals and "empty nesters".

By: brentwoodsneed on 7/31/11
Thank you MAyor Webb for voting against this. You apparently are the only one who sees the whole picture. I wrote a lead article that appeared in the local paper years ago entitled "Everyone cant live in Brentwood "! My points were: This is a novel community because everyone wants too, but if you water down the appeal and give all the space away and clutter the wonder, its just going to be another city. Look at Gatlinburg ... then, and now. No appeal at all to go to compared to the intregue and wonderment it offered then. We had it and lost a lot of it with Nobles corner now a Walgreens. Lots of W's, no more corner landmark gateway. We are more worried about a flapping sign over Corkys than adding 393 more cars to congestion central. Every commisioner should be made to park their car from 4:00-6:00 on every escape route -from Church Street to Granny White and see the 1000 people we drag from all areas each day.
Now add 400 plus (more than 1 car per unit)to the mix, and watch for a Green Hills traffice bonanza. Who are we also kidding that the developer "plans" on keeping them 7-10 years .If it were written in stone, they could change their minds tomorrow. Its a money game,Condo or apt...Call it any name,but MONEY is the name. Convenience, walking traffic are all smoke screens. Utopia does not exist. Creature comforts do. Let Nashville have all these people. Apartments and low price condo's are all around the hill by I-65 and on Church St and they all contribute to our purse. Metro has to keep their kids and police their turf, pave their roads and put out their fires, yet we BENEFIT. That should be our draw.
This is not going to be cheap living. They could make mortagage payments for less than rent will be. Convenience comes with a profit to the owners.
I am the last to be buried in the Sneed Cemetery on Old Smyrna Rd...I just hope the hearse can get thru the traffice before I start to smell.

By: Grandmatrouble on 8/1/11
I agree 100% with Mayor Webb and cpateach. My granddaughter has told me of children who reside elsewhere but use the address of a relative in the Wmsn. County School Districts just to go to our schools. I think capteach has very valid concerns. It seems to me that these are nothing more than rental apartments. What would prevent a group of aliens who's imigration status is in question, from renting one of these and have 6 or 8 people living there? I know this happens in Franklin from personal experience.
I voted for the lottery because they promised to send our kids to school. Once established, they run strictly by their board of directors and the money is not necessarily spent as I believed it would be when I voted yes. Apparantly no one can monitor them or change their spending habits. I see this as exactly the same situation. Once voted in, built and ready to rent, who would monitor who lives there, how many people live in one apartment, many other issues. I think it would overburden our schools as well. MAYOR WEBB, YOU GOT THIS ONE RIGHT. Too bad the other commissioners didn't have your insight.

By: Grandmatrouble on 8/1/11
I have 2 questions: 1) Did you provide a limit on how many people can occupy one of these rental units at the same time? 2) If you did provide a limit, how are you going to enforce it? A Franklin police officer told me the apartments behind CiCi's Pizza, Crown Jewelers, there are lots of people in one apartment and to hide it, they park in those parking lots and walk between the buildings to get to their apartment. From where I am sitting, Mayor Webb is the only one who thought this thru. People do what people do. If you want it to be different, don't present the opportunity. MAYOR WEBB FOREVER!!!

By: spike on 8/1/11
Revisionist history, MidTn37027. If you will recall the discussion at the first hearing...It was represented that this was a condominium project, but that it was necessary that rental of some units might be necessary "on a temporary basis" until all could be sold. That made sense. But would you not call it deception when Northwestern Mutual Life (owner) obviously considered it an apartment project? Presenting it as a condo project has multiple advantages: (1) "apartment" is a negative word in Brentwood, and the use of "condo" lessened opposition; (2) conversion of these apartment units to sale units will be easier in the more distant future since the project has been approved as a condominium, and will have separately deeded units (although owned by one entity). The developer has done a great job in maximizing the economic value of the land and the project, and protecting it's potential future value. But the residents of Brentwood will have to live with the negatives this project will produce. It's simply an over-burdening of the existing facilities and services of the City. And yes, MidTn37027, it's pretty simple to call anything by a different name, but this project does not meet the definition of a "condominium" (look it up), but completely fits into "apartment". So, of course there was deception, and you get the LOL if you want to re-write the facts. What is even more troubling, however, is to have any of the Members support this project when the majority of the citizen input they received was negative.

By: MidTn37027 on 8/1/11
Deception? Well, for the sake of argument, let's give that there was "slick marketing" and “perfuming the pig” by the developer. That there was a twisting of semantics about whether they are "condos" or "rental condos" and run with that. If I got this straight, that would then imply that SIX of the seven Commissioners weren't smart enough to see through the sham and got "duped" along the way by the developers into making an ill informed decision? Really?

Since we're discussing the facts, let's look at them:

1. All of the Commissioners studied this project for hours. A decision either way had huge ramifications. They anguished over their decision many a night and did not take their vote lightly.

2. There was no majority opinion either way. Who could know that? Those Commissioners that spoke of their constituent communications suggested it was roughly half and half. One can’t imply a majority position based upon who shows up at a meeting. There are close to 27,000 registered voters, and we’re lucky if ten percent vote. So, other than a referendum, there is no way of knowing what “the majority” truly wants because most people don’t take the time to get involved and speak out.

We elect Commissioners and trust they'll make decisions in the best interest of Brentwood. All seven of them did what they thought was best, and I can respect either decision, but the fact is they fully vetted this project and made the decision they thought was best for Brentwood.

Let’s give them a little more credit than that.

By: localboy on 8/2/11
Beginning of the end...?;)

By: Vanderbilt on 8/2/11
Revisionist history, Spike. Do you not recall the battle that took place when zoning was amended to allow the Country Club development (who, coincidentally and hypocritically, provided the most organized opposition to this project) to "violate the spirit of one home per acre density" by permitting 2-3 homes to be built on one acre in exchange for 1-2 acres of green space? It was going to be the end of Brentwood as we knew it. Last I checked, though, Country Club Drive doesn't resemble Harlem. I’m embarrassed by the elitist attitudes so many have displayed here. Once this project is completed 99.99% of us won't even know it exists.

By: RetiredGuy on 8/3/11
Have you heard the term "Brentwood snobs"? Get over it people! Brentwood is becoming a progressive community whether you like it or not. The Commissioners showed leadership and foresight.

We desperately need diversity and the Bristol project will deliver it. This is what the Town Center is all about.

By: BrentCampbell on 8/3/11
OK people, if you want to blame somebody... blame me! I'm the land owner that started this whole process 3 years ago.

Blame me for having a vision for the Town Center that you obviously do not share.

Blame me for expanding the Town Center concept last November.

Blame me for getting this property zoned last Thursday.

Blame me for choosing a high quality local developer that will build a great facility.

Blame me for Northwest Mutual Life Insurance Company investing $50 million in our great City.

Blame me for the $millions in annual economic impact the Brentwood merchants will share.

Blame me for dragging this community into the 21st century... it seems a few of you kicking and screaming all the way.

Blame me for finally getting something done.

Yes-yes-yes I'm the evil doer!

And while you're at it, you can blame me if it rains today!


Login and voice your opinion!
Do you know someone else who would like to see this?
Your Email:
Their Email:
Comment:
(Will be included with e-mail)
Secret Code

In the box below, enter the Secret Code exactly as it appears above *