|
|
| BRENTWOOD VIEW: Rezoning brings split communities together |
Posted: Sunday, November 21, 2010 9:59 pm
|
Email Print
|
|
|
By KRISTEN RICHARDSON Special to Brentwood Home Page I spent a recent Monday night and the day after churning ideas through my head about where to go from here. Last Monday was the meeting where the Williamson County Board of Education voted 10-2 for the county-wide rezoning plan. When I ask, I know some of you will identify and say ‘Yes, I was disappointed in the vote,’ but for me, it might not be for the reasons you think.
When I started this journey last year, it began at a neighborhood meeting to discuss the potential rezoning of our development from Ravenwood High School to Centennial High School. All I thought about was my tiny little portion of the rezoning and how it would impact our area. I didn’t even intend to be a leader in the group; I just volunteered to facilitate that particular meeting for a friend who called for the meeting but wasn’t comfortable leading it.
My role took on a life of its own from there. Other Cool Springs developments began to contact each other and the neighborhood organizers engaged into one group to see what we might do as a larger group. Even at that point my focus was still our Cool Springs area. Our community felt such pride when last year’s proposed rezoning was stopped. Despite the fact we represented only Cool Springs, our end goal was for the Central Office to take a county-wide look and see what made the most sense for the entire county.
We had visions that a long, involved process of school board, parent and central office discussions would ensue. Then, this past September, another new rezoning plan was released. And the process began anew again. Ten months had passed and no parent interaction was sought from the school board or the central office prior to a proposed rezoning.
In my Cool Springs-area neighborhood, the processes began pretty much the same as they had done a year prior. The various neighborhood organizers met. We attended public meetings en mass and e-mails sailed across the Internet at lightning speed.
The organizers tried to step it up a notch this time and we actively engaged board members outside of our district as well as Superintendent of Schools Dr. Mike Looney to get them to help us understand the plan.
Somewhere along the line, we started communicating across the county and meeting other neighborhood organizers. As I met these counterparts across the district and listened to their plight, my goal took on a different meaning. I saw far beyond my own neighborhood and looked at the county. My eyes were opened to too many neighborhoods that had ceased to function as neighborhoods due to the countless rezoning of their children. They were neighborhoods divided. It was an awful sight.
Could you ever imagine that rezoning children from one school to another would tear the fabric of a community? Imagine places in Williamson County where neighbors have ugly exchanges over the opinion of the best feeder pattern for the neighborhood! Some neighborhoods have three houses in a row where each high school student attends a different high school. Does that startle you? It did me.
From that point forward I began to think differently. I began to pay attention to the plan and the impact it had on the county as a whole. I couldn’t get comfortable with any plan, none of them felt right. I struggled over why a plan couldn’t create larger groups of students who would migrate from one level to the next, together. It was obvious we had geographic challenges in the county that would complicate the feeder patterns. I tried crunching numbers to make it work out in my mind, but I couldn’t make it work. Never mind I was working with high level numbers anyway; did I really think I was going to be able to see it without the details?
All of the issues that my neighborhood had in common with other county neighbors began to take on a new urgency. I pursued with renewed interest, a different approach that would produce a more equitable outcome. If Edulog was run with proximity as its main parameter, would that change things? The neighborhoods and I struggled to find out; we never did.
Did the process have to move so quickly? What was the rush? It seemed there were never enough hours in the day to meet with other neighbors, spend time on the phone with even more, and slow down enough to get a grip on the whole situation.
I knew six months was spent setting up Edulog, and two months were spent churning out three different plans. The central office had to work 18-hour days, sometimes seven days a week. I knew they were working extremely hard and diligently, but I couldn’t understand against what deadline? I never resolved that question either.
In the end, the neighborhoods across the county paired up and created a Web site and a petition to get the word out. We realized the only people to take notice were the ones who lived in areas where the change in schools would impact their children. Just as I had not paid attention in the past when my kids weren’t affected, so did all those whose lives were going on as usual. We wondered, "How do we get them involved?" Could we garner support to really change the process? Though the group had differences of opinion on what should be presented and how it should be presented, we managed to find a way to each express our own parts and accept what others put out there with us in honor of supporting each other for what we believed was a greater cause.
In the end, the central office was able to pass the third rezoning plan. None of the three plans varied wildly. Each came up with about the same geographic areas to be affected just different feeder patterns applied. The greatest change, and so well deserved, was the dual zoning of east Brentwood’s Southern Woods and surrounding developments. This is one neighborhood that had been so fragmented by rezoning over the last eight years, they needed that to heal. In time, if they aren’t rezoned again, I think they will heal.
And so here I am, sorely disappointed that our group was unable to make any headway into the process and that I couldn’t help the larger community, not just Cool Springs.
Am I disheartened for Cool Springs? Oh YES, absolutely. But when I look at other areas of the county, those who have smaller split feeders, those whose neighborhood can’t be a neighborhood, I see we fared better than some.
The greater part of my disappointment is for the whole county. We said all we could say. We worked to exhaustion and in the end nothing changed and the plan passed. I wanted more for our county. I wanted more for our children, our families. I wanted children to have the opportunity to experience the easy confidence that comes with knowing your buddies know you, to experience the sense of community that comes from having a shared history with a group of kids. If you haven’t had a chance to read Melissa Mitchell’s commentary in the Sept. 14 edition of The Tennessean, “Community will prevail in school rezoning battle,” I recommend it. It is eloquently written. I wanted the confidence as a parent that comes with knowing the children (and those children’s parents) with whom your children attend school.
Just so we’re clear, it wasn’t about the schools. Those issues became superficial as we became more educated about the make-up and output of various schools. We all know Williamson County Schools are good schools, we know we rank highly in the nation and we know we are blessed. It wasn’t about the schools. It was about much, much more than that.
Life changes no matter what we do. Our kids will inevitably learn that lesson with every new level of school, every new job and every new problem life will bring to them up front and center. What we are after is the creation of community and the string of intangible benefit that comes with it.
In a National Educators Association (NEA) policy brief on the importance of parent, family and community involvement in Education, the article notes researchers cite parent-family-community involvement as a key to addressing the school dropout crisis and that strong school-family-community partnerships foster higher educational aspirations and more motivated students.
Now I, along with everyone else involved, have stopped and we are thinking -- where do I go from here? Is there interest in working toward a more proactive rezoning process? Is there interest in better ways to keep from breaking up the established cultures and communities that surround schools? Is there interest in the larger community to find other ways to hold the school board, central office and the county commission more fiscally responsible?
I ask you, can we, the community, garner enough energy to stand up, dust ourselves off and find out if there is something more to be done?
I certainly expect it from this great county. Stealing from a common phrase these days, “We are Williamson County,” right?.
|
|
Printer-friendly format
|
Member Opinions:
By: m_adams on 11/22/10
Ravenwood High has too many students for its facilities. And with the further development of east Brentwood, the overcrowding will continue without rezoning some of these students to other WCS high schools. East Cool Springs is the closest RHS-zoned community to an underutilized facility, Centennial High School. What should be an obvious, fiscally-sound solution has been complicated by parents such as the author of this article. The true question in all of our minds is this - were their protests born of altruistic desires for a better community dialogue with Williamson County Schools, as this author argues, and to demand improved WCS fiscal responsibility? Or did their protest have more to do with the published scores of the two High Schools involved in this discussion and the perceived impact on their children and real estate values? When the author wrote "Just so we're clear, this wasn't about the schools", she acknowledged the inherent problem with her position. And I have to wonder, if her home had been rezoned to Brentwood High School, would we have heard such howls of displeasure? Err, I mean such a spirited rally for "the creation of community and the string of intangilbe benefit that comes with it"? If the effort these parents have put into their protests were rechanneled into physical and fiscal support for the faculty and staff at CHS, everyone would benefit - the students, the school and the parents themselves. The kids would learn the most valuable lesson of all, which is to do the best you can with the hand you're dealt. Heck, these parents will probably be protesting a future rezoning back to RHS, once they discover the wonderful faculty, facilities and available space at CHS.
By: Naturalist on 11/22/10
I am in the Southern Woods neighborhood and to be honest tired of fighting this battle. My prayer is that this neighborhood will not be subjected to another change 2 or 3 years down the road. This neighborhood is fragmented and the dual busing solution is not an answer just a bone tossed to a few. After 12 years here I have little hope that the process will ever change or improve.
By: cba1956 on 11/22/10
Call it what it is - a pouty piece that does not cover up what we all know is privately being said by this author and her neighbors ------that they paid too much for their houses for their kids to be zoned to Centennial. It IS school specific. Give me a break. As a long time Williamson County resident who has been rezoned MULTIPLE times, I sorry that Brentwood Home Page gave space to this. LET'S MOVE ON. And guess what? There will be more rezonings in our futures, as long as their is more homes being built....
By: CaptiveAudience on 11/22/10
I live in Southern Woods and yes Naturalist the neighborhood will be subjected to another change "2 or 3 years down the road". School Board members and those in central office have already said that Southern Woods faces a high likelihood of another rezoning when the new high school is built. Our kids will be moved again. They have already planted the proverbial seed as they say. In 3 years, we will hear, 'we told you this could happen'. But in the short term central office got what they wanted - the ability to show evidence of a comprehensive zoning plan in order to validate the request of securing funds from the County Commission. Were we pawns? Maybe. But regardless of the politics and motivations involved, did we pay a very high price? Absolutly. The 12-year pattern of rezoning Southern Woods continues.
By: Richardson6 on 11/22/10
In response to m_adams - Prior to making assumptions one should inquire of the person of which you are speaking. The objection to rezoning was about the 17% split feeder (30 to 40 kids out of 250, each year, split from Woodland middle and sent to a different high school after being with those same kids and families 9 years.) We were fighting for a 40 to 50% split. We ended up with somewhere between 22 and 28%. We were NOT fighting to stay at RHS - and I might add- will STILL be overcrowded EVERY year for the next 5 years even with this rezoning. The comment toward improved fiscal responsibility addresses various factors, such as the following: One of the main reasons the county has had such ridiculous rezoning is the size of the elementary and middle schools are too large for the size high schools. It automatically creates overcrowded high schools. Yet now the talk is to build even smaller sized high schools (reduce from 1800 to 1200). In addition, the location of some schools are too close together and that has lead to schools having difficulty with utilization. In the current 5 year plan, the newest high school, Summitt, will still be UNDER CAPACITY by 500 students at the END OF 5 YEARS. It was built on the county line about a mile or two east of Independence High. Does that sound fiscally responsible to you? Page High will be UNDER CAPACITY at the end of 5 years by 300 students. Franklin High will be OVER CAPACITY all 5 years. Does this sound fiscally responsible to you? To build a high school costs this county around $40 million dollars. The county is already in debt $500 million dollars, to build the new NE High School may require a tax increase. I would think these issues would ignite taxpayer interest and vigilance so we find ways to help Williamson County out of the hole it currently sits in with regard to the School System. And for the record –Some of us are already in contact with CHS administration and with area parents who are willing to immediately connect with the administrators to discuss any and all issues. For those who plan to go to CHS, this will also assist in the transition. As you ‘tactfully’ brought up, there is an obvious question about the test scores from CHS which parents need to become educated about. In their defense, any parent would have some fear or questioning when asked to move from a one school with such high scores to another with lower scores. It’s a natural reaction, the real question is what do they do after that? Do they prejudge and go no further or do they figure out the real details behind the number and then make a decision. Most of us are pursuing the latter.
By: localwag on 11/23/10
Good posts, m_adams, naturalist, cha1956. Richardson6 brings up a good point to ponder, though - which way should the county go, larger high schools or smaller elementary/middle schools? If the high schools become any larger, they become like the factories seen in Davidson County; however, smaller feeder schools equate to a larger number of schools required, which in turn means more land acquisitions required (which has proven difficult enough over the last ten years finding the right piece of land in the right location at a reasonable price), more buses and bus routes (and finding bus drivers that accept the county pay scale). It's a quandary. But one thing is for sure, this ridiculous low property tax rate for one of the wealthier counties in the country will have to be increased to support the infrastructure requirements for all the developments that the county commissioners have approved and keep on approving with seemingly little regard to school system impact.
By: m_adams on 11/23/10
Ms. Richardson, you are correct, I don't know you or your motivations, but "the lady doth protest too much, methinks". The rezoning issues in WCS are purely the offshoot of unbridled growth, not the size of the primary schools. And your argument against the placement of the high schools is made only with the benefit of hindsight and does not take into account the price and availability of land or the development forecast for Thompson's Station/Spring Hill prior to the recession and closing of the Saturn plant. Nearly all communities that have experienced the growth we have in Williamson County have also suffered similar issues with their schools. We are just following the established pattern . . . so, in 25 years, we'll be selling school properties to developers as the population matures and young families buy into, say, affordable SW county, where the developers will have set up shop. In addition, it is no longer a given that kids will spend 9 years with the same classmates in primary & middle school - the rezoning in WCS is just one of the contributing factors. The population of Brentwood is also much more fluid than you seem to think. Many families have their children in 2 or more schools before high school as modern career paths evolve from those of our parents generations. Gone are the lifetime jobs and static homesteads your vision requires, replaced by mobile families - with new found opportunities. Lastly, in response to your insinuations of skullduggery and incompetence with regard to the school building process, there are checks & balances built into the funding process. I find it hard to believe that any group that has taken the piddling share of state funding our county receives (not to mention the artificially low property tax rate) and still managed to maintain the finest academic system in the state could be referred to as anything less than fiscally responsible. The current and recent County Board and Superintendant of Schools should be commended for their success instead of dragged through the mud by parents displeased with the inevitable rezoning. As a matter of fact, all the over and under utilization of high schools you pointed out would be easily remedied were it not for the inability of the powers-that-be to implement all the necessary rezoning. Why aren't more students moved from RHS to PHS? Why is Franklin HS overcrowded yet CHS is under capacity? Its because "we the people", though our votes and voices, have let it be known that it is acceptable to have overcrowded, high-performing schools. "Throw some portables on the blacktop, just keep my kid at (fill in the blank)." It is this mentality that pushed me to comment on your nicely worded rationalization.
By: brentwoodpop on 11/23/10
Convert this park idea into a New Centrally located School Idea. We already have Crockett Park which is vast. My recommendation is to build a State of the Art New High School with extensive athletic fields, bicycle/segway parking, olympic pool, high capacity auditorium, tennis/soccer/football/baseball stadiums etc in the 320 acres as an adjunct to Ravenwood. This should be a model school for the nation. Convert Existing Ravenwood High into Ravenwood Middle. Change Woodland Middle to be a part of Crockett Elementary. The High school should have capacity for 3500 students. That will accomodate growth in the East Brentwood area for the next 50 years.
By: Richardson6 on 11/24/10
I’ll agree the argument against the placement of some of the schools is only in the benefit of hindsight. Regardless, there are different methods of obtaining land than just purchasing what is cheapest and available. And while I don’t yet fully understand the use of eminent domain or other methods, I will certainly be looking into them. I am certain the past decisions were made and felt to be the best decision at the time. Contrary to your comment that I [insinuated ‘skullduggery and incompetence’] on the part of the school board, those are not my words or feelings. I see the county is in need of change of methodology. The ‘let’s do it as we always do it’ isn’t providing solutions that end up as fiscally responsible for this county. The same way my viewpoint has evolved throughout this past year as I have become more and more educated about the school system, is the way I expect to address any of the issues I’ve brought up. And while I probably shouldn’t even bother responding to this, I will… if not staying with the same group of kids in the primary years wasn’t such an issue, then, there wouldn’t be near as large an uproar over rezoning. Changing jobs doesn’t mean moving accept for a small amount of families. My husband and I have changed jobs several times and have managed to live in the same house for 10 years and would like not to move until our kids are out of school. To link the two together is a stretch. Sure some people move to improve their space, I’ve known many. The many I have known try first to stay within their current feeder pattern and move out of it only if they believe they are improving the schooling of their child. To your statement– “As a matter of fact, all the over and under utilization of high schools you pointed out would be easily remedied were it not for the inability of the powers-that-be to implement all the necessary rezoning.” The School Board voted 10-2 for a plan that didn’t take care of it all. Why? What they voted through was not a county-wide reassessment. It was still spot rezoning and will require yet another rezoning to move areas back into the schools they were just moved out of. You asked – “Why aren't more students moved from RHS to PHS? Why is Franklin HS overcrowded yet CHS is under capacity?” And you think it is because parents are willing to stay at the current school and use portables and that’s why the School Board didn’t ask for a more comprehensive plan? What does that tell us?
By: localwag on 11/24/10
'so, in 25 years, we'll be selling school properties to developers as the population matures and young families buy into, say, affordable SW county, where the developers will have set up shop.' Similar to what happened to the old T Station school on 31 back in the '70s.
By: mom2three on 11/24/10
m_adams, naturalist, cha1956, and localwag- Sadly, you have all missed the boat on this whole rezoning thing. It appears that you are BIG CHS supporters, and are so angry at the lack of community support for your school that you never even tried to grasp the real problem here. We are NOT mad that we are being sent to CHS, we ARE mad that we are being sent to CHS when all of our children's friends are being sent on to RHS. We have a right to be angry about that...regardless of how YOU feel we SHOULD feel. Instead of the parents of CHS making this a personal fight about trying to prove how good your school is, you should have been concentrating your efforts into convincing your school board representatives that you need even more students than us. Which you do!! Your school is still way under capacity. You are not concerned about that though. You just need some warm bodies at your school and you never cared how you go them. Well, we are going to be there now; and in such small numbers that we are not going to make any difference in the test scores, PTA involvement, programs, etc. Your school will be no better off next year than it is this year, and you have no body to blame but yourselves. Watch and see!!!!!
By: really on 11/26/10
In response to m_adams: The man doth protest to much, me thinks. REALLY! You should be humble enough to admit in all your all- knowingness, you don't really know anything about why so many families are protesting. Really. You do not know me and I am protesting. I venture to guess you do not know many of the other families who are protesting. Each individual child impacted, as well as their families, have many varied reasons for protesting. The main reason I have protested is because my son, a freshman at Ravenwood, grew up here. We live 2 miles from Ravenwood. My son went to school at Kenrose, then Woodland. Over the years he has looked forward to going to Ravenwood. It was the High School we drove by everyday on the way home from Kenrose, and then from Woodland. It was, and still is, the school we drive by every time we go anywhere. Whether it is to Publix, the bank, the mall, piano lessons, baseball practice, basketball practice, anywhere. I am sure in all your wisdom and sad pessimism, you would be sure and bring up McEwen as a way I could get to some of the places we go in our everyday lives, but the truth of the matter is it takes about the same time to get to I65 via Moores Lane, and it is a much safer road to traverse. And like I said many other weekly activities take us right by Ravenwood and we would never go McEwen for those activities. As my little boys grew up, Ravenwood looked so big and was a wonderful place they looked forward to going to someday. My oldest son dreamed for many years of the day he would be in High School there. His little brother does the same. Both of them learned to ride their bikes in the Ravenwood parking lot on Sunday afternoons. His little brother has been to many of his older brothers football games and is so excited to be going there, just like his big brother someday. My point is, I feel sad for you and all the other people who share your opinions and miss the point. This is about the well being of our children.(PERIOD) Really!!! Our country is in a time of struggle right now. Many families, even in Brentwood, are struggling like never before. There are more pressures put on families from all directions. Children are already learning about adversity. Some are watching their moms who used to stay home, now going to work. Some are watching their moms and dads who always worked, having to work longer hours. We don't need rezoning to teach our kids about adapting to adversity and making the best of it. As a matter of fact, it is the last thing we need right now. I hear you and so many people, including the school board, talk about the troubles with overcrowding. Is overcrowding not adversity?? That particular adversity is intolerable, and so detrimental to our children according to the school board and people like you. And yet tearing our children away from their community, separating them from the friends that they have grown up with for years, is less tolerable and less detrimental?? REALLY????? In all things the school board is supposed to put children first. I do not believe, nor does my son who is at Ravenwood everyday, believe overcrowding at Ravenwood is putting a great amount of stress on our kids. Separating kids and busing them 20 minutes away from where they live IS putting stress on our kids. This whole rezoning issue is a hot mess. It makes no sense. The most important thing we can teach our kids is to love one another. To treat each other as we want to be treated. To be compassionate and caring. The school Board seems to have lost their way in treating our kids like dominoes they can shuffle around and not treating them like individuals. They have also lost sight of the importance of community. If you want to argue overcrowding is detrimental for the students, fine. But you can not argue that it is more detrimental than separating kids from their social peer groups, their neighborhood, their way of life, and snatching away the opportunity to go to a school they drive by everyday. It is especially egregious to pull freshman high schoolers out of their school. If you live 8-10 miles away from Ravenwood, you are zoned for Ravenwood. If you live 2-3 miles away from Ravenwod you are not. REALLY???? Really! I could go on and on but the point I am trying to make is you are sadly mistaken about most of your opinions on why parents are so upset. Believe it or not, we put our kids first! Our main concern for protesting is the well being of our children. You can never protest too much if you feel your children are being mistreated or harmed, especially if it is intentional!!! Do you even have kids? As a matter of fact I can't think of one thing more important than the mistreatment of your kids to protest about! It is shocking to think you or anyone else would think we as parents are protesting, and are so very upset, for any reason other than we are concerned about our children we love so much. We see the injustice, and the inconsideration, and the blind eye of compassion and we are sick over it. We love our kids. We want the best for our kids. This crazy rezoning plan does not put children first. It is this kind of adversity you teach your children to fight, not to accept and make the most of. It is this kind of political, governmental intrusion into your life that you fight, not that make the best of. If the pilgrims had your opinion, we would still be under british rule. The guy who came up with this plan is named "Looney". REALLY??? Really!!!!! Now that makes perfect sense. All Williamson County residents should protest when you have a system that allows one man with the power to draw arbitrary lines which affect thousands of families and children. There should be laws put on the books to ensure the next superintendent is elected, not appointed. There should also be a law against the school board having the power to affect so many families. The bottom line is to few people have too much power to affect such a large group of citizens. As my Daddy used to say, " Buy em books and send em to school, and they still don't have a lick of common sense. Wake up Williamson county!!! Go to Bed m_adams! Love Ya and Praying for a miracle! REALLY!!!!!!
By: Anotherparent on 11/30/10
The process is broken. It is clear. Rezoning did not fix overcrowding at Ravenwood. It did not fix undercapacity at Centennial. It rezoned children from one undercapacity elementary school to another undercapacity elementary school. It is truly contingent upon funding that the Board does not have yet. It was passed as a 5 year plan before they had "time" to come up with their strategic plan. Truly, this is nonsensical. As for Cool Springs, it has always been about the feeder pattern for me. My daughter will be one of about 20% who will be split from all of her friends when entering high school -- a hard time as it is. We asked for 40-50%. However, I was told that this is the "best plan they could come up with." If they truly wanted the "best" plan, they should have properly used the tools (Edulog) that they had instead of only utilizing it the first time with bad parameters and incorrect information. Like the rezoning or not, it is hard not to argue that it was handled optimally.
Login and voice your opinion!
|
|
| Advertisements |
| Please Click on Ads for More Info |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|